The Fund Grade · free · no account needed
Morningstar rates funds on what they returned. We grade them on where their money sits today: how much of the book overlaps with the converged buys of the top specialist stock pickers.
Fundprints Fund Grade · as of 2026-09-01
TCW Relative Value Large Cap Fund Cl N
#136 of 440 graded active funds · value · large segment peer group
The point · specialist footprint
TGDVX puts more of its book behind proven specialists than 77% of graded funds.
Bottom 20%
Bottom 40%
Middle
● Top 40%
Top 20%
That has mattered: over the past 2.7 years, funds on this rung beat bottom-rung funds by about 3.8 points per quarter, and beat the S&P in 43% of fund-quarters versus their 22%. The evidence argues this fund earns its seat.
2,825 graded funds · 2.7 years of filings, measured as they were published · evidence, not advice
The grade scores this fund's specialist share — the slice that overlaps what the top 1% of proven funds are building. We ignore index ballast and names outside our edge on purpose: that slice is small, and it's what decides the outcome.
Conviction exposure
31.6%
of the book in specialist-converged names
Late-stage weight
21.2%
of the book in Crowded or Fading names
Active share
90.7%
how far it strays from the index
The best grades have beaten the worst by about +5% a year since we began grading. The gap held in 9 out of 10 months. Measured on filings as they were published, no hindsight.
Inside the book — top names by stage · as of 2026-09-09
We email you the day it crosses 50% crowded, and where you stand every month.
Graded monthly from point-in-time filings. A description of where the money sits, not a recommendation. Evidence, not advice.
The read · what to do with it
TGDVX earns a B grade with specialists holding about 32% of the fund, which is a solid base of informed ownership. The early positions in AMZN and ICE stand out, while five holdings including NI, UPS, PFE, IBM, and AMT all show specialists walking away, which is a real drag on the portfolio story.
→ Watch the five fading positions, NI, UPS, PFE, IBM, and AMT, which together represent over 11% of the fund.
→ The early conviction in AMZN and ICE argues for monitoring whether specialist share in those two names grows or stalls.
Support leaving these positions
Read from today's disclosed book. Evidence, not advice.
The specialists — not the whales — are already positioned for what comes next. Stop finding out last.
Create your free accountNo card required · open the feed in 30 seconds