The Fund Grade · free · no account needed

What grade does PZFVX get?

Morningstar rates funds on what they returned. We grade them on where their money sits today: how much of the book overlaps with the converged buys of the top specialist stock pickers.

A

Fundprints Fund Grade · as of 2026-09-01

John Hancock Classic Value Fund

#111 of 440 graded active funds · value · mid segment peer group

The point · specialist footprint

PZFVX puts less of its book behind proven specialists than 69% of graded funds.

Bottom 20%

● Bottom 40%

Middle

Top 40%

Top 20%

beat the S&P in 22% of quarters+3.8 pts/qtr better · 43% beat rate

That has mattered: over the past 2.7 years, funds with this little specialist backing trailed top-rung funds by about 3.8 points per quarter and beat the S&P in only 22% of fund-quarters. If it also charges an active fee, the higher-graded alternatives deserve a look.

2,825 graded funds · 2.7 years of filings, measured as they were published · evidence, not advice

The grade scores this fund's specialist share — the slice that overlaps what the top 1% of proven funds are building. We ignore index ballast and names outside our edge on purpose: that slice is small, and it's what decides the outcome.

Conviction exposure

7%

of the book in specialist-converged names

Late-stage weight

23.7%

of the book in Crowded or Fading names

Active share

97.9%

how far it strays from the index

The best grades have beaten the worst by about +5% a year since we began grading. The gap held in 9 out of 10 months. Measured on filings as they were published, no hindsight.

Inside the book — top names by stage · as of 2026-09-09

Consensus
HUM 5.4%BAX 4.9%SWKS 4.3%+16 locked
Emerging
DG 2.7%CTSH 2.4%ACN 1.3%
Crowded
CVS 5.4%LEA 3.3%GPN 3.3%+4 locked
Fading
FMS 4%TSN 3%PFE 2.4%

We email you the day it crosses 50% crowded, and where you stand every month.

Graded monthly from point-in-time filings. A description of where the money sits, not a recommendation. Evidence, not advice.

The read · what to do with it

John Hancock Classic Value Fund earns an A grade, ranking 111 of 440 graded funds, with specialist managers building early positions in DG, CTSH, and ACN. The concern is that nearly a quarter of the portfolio sits in late-stage or crowded trades, including CVS and FMS where specialists are already leaving.

Watch CVS, FMS, LEA, GPN, and TSN closely, as specialists are crowding out or fading from all five positions totaling over 19% of the fund.

Note that DG, CTSH, and ACN are Emerging stage picks, where the grade of A suggests the early conviction may be well placed.

Support leaving these positions

CVS 5.4% of the fund · Crowded

FMS 4% of the fund · Fading

LEA 3.3% of the fund · Crowded

GPN 3.3% of the fund · Crowded

TSN 3% of the fund · Fading

Where it's genuinely early

DG 2.7% of the fund · Emerging

CTSH 2.4% of the fund · Emerging

ACN 1.3% of the fund · Emerging

Read from today's disclosed book. Evidence, not advice.

The evidence base updates this week.

The specialists — not the whales — are already positioned for what comes next. Stop finding out last.

Create your free account

No card required · open the feed in 30 seconds