The Fund Grade · free · no account needed
What grade does OIEJX get?
Morningstar rates funds on what they returned. We grade them on where their money sits today: how much of the book overlaps with the converged buys of the top specialist stock pickers.
Fundprints Fund Grade · as of 2026-09-01
JPMorgan Equity Income R6
#184 of 440 graded active funds · value · large segment peer group
The point · specialist footprint
OIEJX puts more of its book behind proven specialists than 69% of graded funds.
Bottom 20%
Bottom 40%
Middle
● Top 40%
Top 20%
That has mattered: over the past 2.7 years, funds on this rung beat bottom-rung funds by about 3.8 points per quarter, and beat the S&P in 43% of fund-quarters versus their 22%. The evidence argues this fund earns its seat.
2,825 graded funds · 2.7 years of filings, measured as they were published · evidence, not advice
3 funds in the same segment carry an A — members see the names and what they charge. See the alternatives →
The grade scores this fund's specialist share — the slice that overlaps what the top 1% of proven funds are building. We ignore index ballast and names outside our edge on purpose: that slice is small, and it's what decides the outcome.
Conviction exposure
27.9%
of the book in specialist-converged names
Late-stage weight
23.1%
of the book in Crowded or Fading names
Active share
82.7%
how far it strays from the index
The best grades have beaten the worst by about +5% a year since we began grading. The gap held in 9 out of 10 months. Measured on filings as they were published, no hindsight.
Inside the book — top names by stage · as of 2026-09-09
We email you the day it crosses 50% crowded, and where you stand every month.
Graded monthly from point-in-time filings. A description of where the money sits, not a recommendation. Evidence, not advice.
The read · what to do with it
JPMorgan Equity Income R6 earns a C grade, ranking 184 out of 440, with specialist backing at only 27.9 percent. Three higher graded peers exist in this segment. The most striking tension is that LOW, DOV, and HD are all fading positions while early signals are building in MCD and AXP.
→ Watch the combined fading weight in LOW, DOV, and HD closely, as specialists are actively leaving all three positions.
→ Note that MCD, AXP, and XEL show early stage specialist interest, which is the clearest forward looking argument for holding on.
Support leaving these positions
Read from today's disclosed book. Evidence, not advice.
The evidence base updates this week.
The specialists — not the whales — are already positioned for what comes next. Stop finding out last.
Create your free accountNo card required · open the feed in 30 seconds