The Fund Grade · free · no account needed
What grade does TWGGX get?
Morningstar rates funds on what they returned. We grade them on where their money sits today: how much of the book overlaps with the converged buys of the top specialist stock pickers.
Fundprints Fund Grade · as of 2026-10-01
Focused Global Growth Fund Investor Class
#61 of 500 graded active funds · growth · large segment peer group
The point · specialist footprint
TWGGX puts more of its book behind proven specialists than 91% of graded funds.
Bottom 20%
Bottom 40%
Middle
Top 40%
● Top 20%
That has mattered: over the past 2.7 years, funds on this rung beat bottom-rung funds by about 3.8% per quarter, and beat the S&P in 43% of fund-quarters versus their 22%. The evidence argues this fund earns its seat.
10,000+ funds tracked · the graded specialists among them drive every read
You pay 1.10% a year for a A.
The grade scores this fund's specialist share, the slice that overlaps what the top 1% of proven funds are building. We ignore index ballast and names outside our edge on purpose: that slice is small, and it's what decides the outcome.
TWGGX vs the Honor Roll · share card ↗Conviction exposure
58%
of the book in specialist-converged names
Late-stage weight
24.7%
of the book in Crowded or Fading names
Active share
84.4%
how far it strays from the index
The best grades have beaten the worst by about +5% a year since we began grading. The gap held in 9 out of 10 months. Measured on filings as they were published, no hindsight.
Inside the book: top names by stage · as of 2026-10-20
We email you the day it crosses 50% crowded, and where you stand every month.
Graded monthly from point-in-time filings. A description of where the money sits, not a recommendation. Evidence, not advice.
The read · what to do with it
TWGGX holds an A grade, ranking 61 of 500, with 58% specialist ownership backing the thesis. Specialists are building early in Palo Alto Networks and Citigroup, which is the sharpest edge here. The 1.1% fee is notable given that fading positions like Broadcom and Curtiss-Wright together represent over 6% of the fund.
→ Watch AVGO, HWM, FN, and CW closely, as specialists are leaving all four and combined they exceed 10% of the fund.
→ Compare the 1.1% annual fee against lower-cost peers, since the fading weight partly offsets the early-stage conviction in PANW and C.
Support leaving these positions
Read from today's disclosed book. Evidence, not advice.