The Fund Grade · free · no account needed
What grade does TWGGX get?
Morningstar rates funds on what they returned. We grade them on where their money sits today: how much of the book overlaps with the converged buys of the top specialist stock pickers.
Fundprints Fund Grade · as of 2026-09-01
Focused Global Growth Fund Investor Class
#28 of 440 graded active funds · growth · large segment peer group
The point · specialist footprint
TWGGX puts more of its book behind proven specialists than 96% of graded funds.
Bottom 20%
Bottom 40%
Middle
Top 40%
● Top 20%
That has mattered: over the past 2.7 years, funds on this rung beat bottom-rung funds by about 3.8 points per quarter, and beat the S&P in 43% of fund-quarters versus their 22%. The evidence argues this fund earns its seat.
2,825 graded funds · 2.7 years of filings, measured as they were published · evidence, not advice
You pay 1.10% a year for a A.
The grade scores this fund's specialist share — the slice that overlaps what the top 1% of proven funds are building. We ignore index ballast and names outside our edge on purpose: that slice is small, and it's what decides the outcome.
Conviction exposure
53.9%
of the book in specialist-converged names
Late-stage weight
13.2%
of the book in Crowded or Fading names
Active share
81%
how far it strays from the index
The best grades have beaten the worst by about +5% a year since we began grading. The gap held in 9 out of 10 months. Measured on filings as they were published, no hindsight.
Inside the book — top names by stage · as of 2026-09-09
We email you the day it crosses 50% crowded, and where you stand every month.
Graded monthly from point-in-time filings. A description of where the money sits, not a recommendation. Evidence, not advice.
The read · what to do with it
TWGGX earns an A grade and ranks 28th out of 440 funds, with specialists making up nearly 54% of its ownership, a top-20% footprint among peers. Its most striking early conviction bet is a 7% position in NVDA alongside meaningful stakes in AMZN and AMD, though five positions including META and FN are now showing specialist exits.
→ Monitor the five Fading positions, particularly FN and CW at over 2% each, as specialist exits there may signal coming underperformance.
→ Weigh the 1.1% annual fee against the A grade; the strong specialist backing may justify the cost, but verify no cheaper peers match it.
Support leaving these positions
Read from today's disclosed book. Evidence, not advice.
The evidence base updates this week.
The specialists — not the whales — are already positioned for what comes next. Stop finding out last.
Create your free accountNo card required · open the feed in 30 seconds