The Fund Grade · free · no account needed
What grade does TARKX get?
Morningstar rates funds on what they returned. We grade them on where their money sits today: how much of the book overlaps with the converged buys of the top specialist stock pickers.
Fundprints Fund Grade · as of 2026-10-01
Tarkio Fund
#473 of 500 graded active funds · blend · large segment peer group
The point · specialist footprint
TARKX puts less of its book behind proven specialists than 65% of graded funds.
Bottom 20%
● Bottom 40%
Middle
Top 40%
Top 20%
That has mattered: over the past 2.7 years, funds with this little specialist backing trailed top-rung funds by about 3.8% per quarter and beat the S&P in only 22% of fund-quarters. If it also charges an active fee, the higher-graded alternatives deserve a look.
10,000+ funds tracked · the graded specialists among them drive every read
3 funds in the same segment carry an A. Members see the names and what they charge. See the alternatives →
The grade scores this fund's specialist share, the slice that overlaps what the top 1% of proven funds are building. We ignore index ballast and names outside our edge on purpose: that slice is small, and it's what decides the outcome.
TARKX vs the Honor Roll · share card ↗Conviction exposure
15%
of the book in specialist-converged names
Late-stage weight
6.5%
of the book in Crowded or Fading names
Active share
98.6%
how far it strays from the index
The best grades have beaten the worst by about +5% a year since we began grading. The gap held in 9 out of 10 months. Measured on filings as they were published, no hindsight.
Inside the book: top names by stage · as of 2026-10-20
We email you the day it crosses 50% crowded, and where you stand every month.
Graded monthly from point-in-time filings. A description of where the money sits, not a recommendation. Evidence, not advice.
The read · what to do with it
Tarkio Fund grades F, ranking 473 out of 500 funds, with only 15% specialist backing. The bigger concern is that five of its largest positions, including LUMN at 17.3% and CGNX at 11.2%, are all in Fading stage, meaning proven specialists are already walking away from those trades.
→ Watch LUMN closely: at 17.3% of the fund with specialists leaving, it represents a concentrated bet in the wrong direction.
→ Three higher graded funds exist in the same segment and may offer meaningfully better specialist conviction without this level of Fading exposure.
Support leaving these positions
Read from today's disclosed book. Evidence, not advice.