The Fund Grade · free · no account needed

What grade does MUHLX get?

Morningstar rates funds on what they returned. We grade them on where their money sits today: how much of the book overlaps with the converged buys of the top specialist stock pickers.

F

Fundprints Fund Grade · as of 2026-10-01

Muhlenkamp Fund

#475 of 500 graded active funds · blend · large segment peer group

The point · specialist footprint

MUHLX puts less of its book behind proven specialists than 67% of graded funds.

Bottom 20%

● Bottom 40%

Middle

Top 40%

Top 20%

beat the S&P in 22% of quarters+3.8%/qtr better · 43% beat rate

That has mattered: over the past 2.7 years, funds with this little specialist backing trailed top-rung funds by about 3.8% per quarter and beat the S&P in only 22% of fund-quarters. If it also charges an active fee, the higher-graded alternatives deserve a look.

10,000+ funds tracked · the graded specialists among them drive every read

3 funds in the same segment carry an A. Members see the names and what they charge. See the alternatives →

The grade scores this fund's specialist share, the slice that overlaps what the top 1% of proven funds are building. We ignore index ballast and names outside our edge on purpose: that slice is small, and it's what decides the outcome.

MUHLX vs the Honor Roll · share card ↗

Conviction exposure

14.3%

of the book in specialist-converged names

Late-stage weight

13.8%

of the book in Crowded or Fading names

Active share

96.2%

how far it strays from the index

The best grades have beaten the worst by about +5% a year since we began grading. The gap held in 9 out of 10 months. Measured on filings as they were published, no hindsight.

Inside the book: top names by stage · as of 2026-10-20

Early Conviction
WAB 3.6%AAPL 3.5%MSFT 2.9%
Consensus
NEM 6.3%RGLD 6.1%MCK 5.5%+6 locked
Emerging
CE 3.1%MCHP 3%
Crowded
EQT 7.1%
Fading
RUSHA 6.2%SLB 4.1%MTZ 3.1%

We email you the day it crosses 50% crowded, and where you stand every month.

Graded monthly from point-in-time filings. A description of where the money sits, not a recommendation. Evidence, not advice.

The read · what to do with it

Muhlenkamp Fund grades F, ranking 475 out of 500 graded funds, with specialist investors holding only 14.3% of the portfolio. EQT is the top position at 7.1% and sits in Crowded territory, while RUSHA and MTZ are both Fading, meaning specialists are already heading for the exits. A small position in CE offers the one early-stage bright spot.

→ Watch RUSHA and MTZ closely, as specialist exit from both Fading positions signals weakening conviction in over 9% of the fund.

→ Compare this fund against the 3 higher graded peers in the same segment, given the F grade and low specialist backing of 14.3%.

Support leaving these positions

EQT 7.1% of the fund · Crowded

RUSHA 6.2% of the fund · Fading

SLB 4.1% of the fund · Fading

MTZ 3.1% of the fund · Fading

Where it's genuinely early

WAB 3.6% of the fund · Early Conviction

AAPL 3.5% of the fund · Early Conviction

CE 3.1% of the fund · Emerging

Read from today's disclosed book. Evidence, not advice.

Find out whether you're early or late. It costs nothing.

Create your free account