The Fund Grade · free · no account needed

What grade does MGRIX get?

Morningstar rates funds on what they returned. We grade them on where their money sits today: how much of the book overlaps with the converged buys of the top specialist stock pickers.

A

Fundprints Fund Grade · as of 2026-09-01

Marsico Growth Fund

#16 of 440 graded active funds · growth · large segment peer group

The point · specialist footprint

MGRIX puts more of its book behind proven specialists than 98% of graded funds.

Bottom 20%

Bottom 40%

Middle

Top 40%

● Top 20%

beat the S&P in 22% of quarters+3.8 pts/qtr better · 43% beat rate

That has mattered: over the past 2.7 years, funds on this rung beat bottom-rung funds by about 3.8 points per quarter, and beat the S&P in 43% of fund-quarters versus their 22%. The evidence argues this fund earns its seat.

2,825 graded funds · 2.7 years of filings, measured as they were published · evidence, not advice

The grade scores this fund's specialist share — the slice that overlaps what the top 1% of proven funds are building. We ignore index ballast and names outside our edge on purpose: that slice is small, and it's what decides the outcome.

Conviction exposure

59.7%

of the book in specialist-converged names

Late-stage weight

14.1%

of the book in Crowded or Fading names

Active share

81.1%

how far it strays from the index

The best grades have beaten the worst by about +5% a year since we began grading. The gap held in 9 out of 10 months. Measured on filings as they were published, no hindsight.

Inside the book — top names by stage · as of 2026-09-09

Early Conviction
AMZN 6.8%GEV 3.3%SHW 2.7%+1 locked
Consensus
NVDA 7.4%MSFT 6%TSM 5.3%+9 locked
Emerging
MCD 3%BA 1.3%
Fading
COST 5%NFLX 3.9%AVGO 3.7%+1 locked

We email you the day it crosses 50% crowded, and where you stand every month.

Graded monthly from point-in-time filings. A description of where the money sits, not a recommendation. Evidence, not advice.

The read · what to do with it

Marsico Growth Fund earns an A grade and ranks 16th out of 440 graded funds, with specialists backing nearly 60 percent of the portfolio. The early conviction positions in NVDA, AMZN, and GE are the standout story here, suggesting proven specialists are still building rather than exiting those trades. Watch the fading signals on COST, META, and BA, which together represent over 10 percent of the fund.

Monitor COST, META, and BA closely as specialists are actively leaving all three fading positions totaling over 10 percent weight.

Note NVDA at 7.4 percent and AMZN at 6.8 percent are Early Conviction stages, suggesting specialists see room to run.

Support leaving these positions

COST 5% of the fund · Fading

NFLX 3.9% of the fund · Fading

AVGO 3.7% of the fund · Fading

HON 2.7% of the fund · Fading

Where it's genuinely early

AMZN 6.8% of the fund · Early Conviction

GEV 3.3% of the fund · Early Conviction

MCD 3% of the fund · Emerging

Read from today's disclosed book. Evidence, not advice.

The evidence base updates this week.

The specialists — not the whales — are already positioned for what comes next. Stop finding out last.

Create your free account

No card required · open the feed in 30 seconds