The Fund Grade · free · no account needed

What grade does GTLLX get?

Morningstar rates funds on what they returned. We grade them on where their money sits today: how much of the book overlaps with the converged buys of the top specialist stock pickers.

A

Fundprints Fund Grade · as of 2026-09-01

Glenmede Disciplined U.S. Growth Equity Portfolio

#19 of 440 graded active funds · growth · mid segment peer group

The point · specialist footprint

GTLLX sits mid pack for specialist backing among graded funds.

Bottom 20%

Bottom 40%

● Middle

Top 40%

Top 20%

beat the S&P in 22% of quarters+3.8 pts/qtr better · 43% beat rate

The middle rungs sat between the extremes, and the pattern was monotonic: every step up in specialist backing came with better subsequent results. Not damning, not compelling. The fee decides whether it is worth it.

2,825 graded funds · 2.7 years of filings, measured as they were published · evidence, not advice

The grade scores this fund's specialist share — the slice that overlaps what the top 1% of proven funds are building. We ignore index ballast and names outside our edge on purpose: that slice is small, and it's what decides the outcome.

Conviction exposure

16.6%

of the book in specialist-converged names

Late-stage weight

25.7%

of the book in Crowded or Fading names

Active share

97.6%

how far it strays from the index

The best grades have beaten the worst by about +5% a year since we began grading. The gap held in 9 out of 10 months. Measured on filings as they were published, no hindsight.

Inside the book — top names by stage · as of 2026-09-09

Consensus
MRVL 4.1%ANET 3.7%TWLO 3.1%+10 locked
Crowded
JBL 1.9%MPWR 1.6%VLTO 0.5%+1 locked
Fading
APH 3.1%TJX 2.6%CCL 0.5%

We email you the day it crosses 50% crowded, and where you stand every month.

Graded monthly from point-in-time filings. A description of where the money sits, not a recommendation. Evidence, not advice.

The read · what to do with it

Glenmede Disciplined U.S. Growth Equity Portfolio earns an A grade and ranks 19th out of 440 graded funds, with specialists building early positions in Arista Networks, Fortinet, and Williams-Sonoma. The concern is a cluster of crowded or fading holdings including Teradyne, TJX, and Jabil that specialists are quietly leaving.

Watch TJX and CCL closely as specialists are actively fading both positions, signaling weakening conviction at the expert level.

Note the Early Conviction weight in ANET at 3.7 percent as evidence the fund is genuinely ahead of consensus in networking.

Support leaving these positions

APH 3.1% of the fund · Fading

TJX 2.6% of the fund · Fading

JBL 1.9% of the fund · Crowded

MPWR 1.6% of the fund · Crowded

CCL 0.5% of the fund · Fading

Read from today's disclosed book. Evidence, not advice.

The evidence base updates this week.

The specialists — not the whales — are already positioned for what comes next. Stop finding out last.

Create your free account

No card required · open the feed in 30 seconds