The Fund Grade · free · no account needed
What grade does ARKW get?
Morningstar rates funds on what they returned. We grade them on where their money sits today: how much of the book overlaps with the converged buys of the top specialist stock pickers.
Fundprints Fund Grade · as of 2026-09-01
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
#38 of 440 graded active funds · growth · large segment peer group
The point · specialist footprint
ARKW puts more of its book behind proven specialists than 94% of graded funds.
Bottom 20%
Bottom 40%
Middle
Top 40%
● Top 20%
That has mattered: over the past 2.7 years, funds on this rung beat bottom-rung funds by about 3.8 points per quarter, and beat the S&P in 43% of fund-quarters versus their 22%. The evidence argues this fund earns its seat.
2,825 graded funds · 2.7 years of filings, measured as they were published · evidence, not advice
You pay 0.76% a year for a A.
The grade scores this fund's specialist share — the slice that overlaps what the top 1% of proven funds are building. We ignore index ballast and names outside our edge on purpose: that slice is small, and it's what decides the outcome.
Conviction exposure
51.2%
of the book in specialist-converged names
Late-stage weight
33.7%
of the book in Crowded or Fading names
Active share
84%
how far it strays from the index
The best grades have beaten the worst by about +5% a year since we began grading. The gap held in 9 out of 10 months. Measured on filings as they were published, no hindsight.
Inside the book — top names by stage · as of 2026-09-09
We email you the day it crosses 50% crowded, and where you stand every month.
Graded monthly from point-in-time filings. A description of where the money sits, not a recommendation. Evidence, not advice.
The read · what to do with it
ARKW earns an A grade and ranks 38 of 440 funds, with specialists making up 51% of its ownership base, a genuinely strong signal. The early story centers on AMD, HOOD, and AMZN where proven specialists are still building. The concern is TSLA at 8.6% and RBLX, both Fading, alongside three Crowded positions eating another 11% of the fund.
→ Watch TSLA closely: at 8.6% it is the largest single drag as specialists are actively leaving that position.
→ The 0.76% fee is high; weigh it against the A grade and whether the early AMD and HOOD positions justify the cost.
Support leaving these positions
Read from today's disclosed book. Evidence, not advice.
The evidence base updates this week.
The specialists — not the whales — are already positioned for what comes next. Stop finding out last.
Create your free accountNo card required · open the feed in 30 seconds